Always headwinds

Wind-energy lease areas off Massachusetts and Rhode Island as of October, 2022

The Massachusetts Wind Technology Testing Center, in Boston’s Charlestown section.

— Photo by vArnoldReinhold

Adapted from Robert Whitcomb’s “Digital Diary,’’ in GoLocal24.com

It was good to hear that the U.S. Interior Department has approved Revolution Wind’s big (700 megawatts) project, southwest of Martha’s Vineyard. The project could provide  electricity for 350,000 homes and create about  1,200  construction jobs.

The  department has also approved  the Vineyard Wind 1 project, off Massachusetts, the South Fork Wind project, off Rhode Island and New York, and the Ocean Wind 1 project, off New Jersey.

But the  regulatory approval process moves at glacial speed, and litigation always threatens to stop such projects in their tracks. Big factors are nimbyism by coastal residents (often led by affluent summer people)  who say that they don’t want to look at wind turbines, as well as opposition by some in the fishing sector because of the mostly temporary disruptions in the areas where they’d be installed. Of course, the damage caused by man-made global warming happens everywhere, in varying degrees of severity.

And the supports for offshore turbines act as artificial reefs that draw fish. Wouldn’t fishermen like that?

Installing any energy source creates problems, but let’s  make rational comparisons….

The complaints by offshore-wind foes are outstandingly hypocritical. Consider that the fossil-fuel burning that wind power is meant to partly replace poses an existential risk to fishing interests by dangerously warming and acidifying the water and disrupting major ocean currents such as the Gulf Stream.  Fossil-fuel burning destroys food sources of marine animals, including whales.

Then there are those pesky oil spills and the disruptions to marine animals by speeding oil tankers.

When you look closely at opposition to coastal and offshore wind projects you see money from – you guessed it! – the oil and gas industry.

Take a look at the stuff in these links:

https://electrek.co/2022/04/18/the-first-us-offshore-wind-farm-has-had-no-negative-effect-on-fish-finds-groundbreaking-study/

https://grist.org/politics/republicans-fossil-fuels-the-gop-donors-behind-a-growing-misinformation-campaign-to-stop-offshore-wind/

https://environment-review.yale.edu/support-and-opposition-offshore-wind-power-us-clash-perceptions-and-reality

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/17/anti-wind-farm-whale-defenders-fossil-fuel-industry

https://heated.world/p/the-fossil-fuel-industrys-deceptive

Previous
Previous

Intriguing indigo

Next
Next

‘Visual equivalents’